Home / India / 12 Years After Delhi Serial Blasts, 2 Accused Freed Since Prosecution ‘Miserably Failed’

12 Years After Delhi Serial Blasts, 2 Accused Freed Since Prosecution ‘Miserably Failed’

 

New Delhi : **Combo** Three accused of 2005 Delhi serial bomb blasts case after the verdict in Patiala House Court in New Delhi on Thursday.PTI Photo by Subhav Shukla(PTI2_16_2017_000186B)

Three accused of 2005 Delhi serial bomb blasts case after the verdict in Patiala House Court in New Delhi on Thursday. — PTI 

A third accused, Tariq Ahmed Dar, was held guilty of being a member of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, but the court said there wasn’t sufficient evidence to link him to any conspiracy.

NEW DELHI — Almost 12 years after the 2005 serial blasts in Delhi which claimed 67 lives, a trial court on Thursday acquitted two of the accused — Mohd Hussain Fazli and Mohd Rafiq Shah — of all charges, saying the prosecution had “miserably failed” to prove their guilt.

A third accused, Tariq Ahmed Dar, was held guilty of being a member of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, but the court said it didn’t find sufficient evidence to link him to the blasts. Acquitting Dar of the charges of conspiracy to wage a war against the government by carrying out the blasts, the court also said the prosecution had failed to establish a link between Dar and the duo who have been acquitted.

Dar was convicted under Section 38 (being a member of a terror organisation) and Section 39 (giving support to such outfit) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). Additional Sessions Judge Reetesh Singh, however, held that Dar had already spent over 10 years in jail — the maximum punishment prescribed under the law for these offences.

Observing that the “essence of conspiracy is a meeting of minds,” the court said, “prosecution has not been able to prove any link between Mohd Hussain Fazli and Mohd Rafiq Shah on one hand and Tariq Ahmed Dar on the other. Contents of the (intercepted) conversation therefore fall short in enabling the court to come to any definite conclusion that Tariq Ahmed Dar was part of the conspiracy behind the blasts.”

The court observed that the prosecution’s case was primarily built around intercepted conversations between Dar and an LeT operative named Abu Al Kama, that reportedly took place on November 1, 2005 and November 4, 2005.

“In the absence of any evidence regarding Tariq Ahmed Dar being involved in any conspiracy behind these blasts, none of the charges against Dar is made out,” said the court. It, however, added that there was sufficient evidence to establish his link with the LeT. “Even though no charges were framed against Tariq Ahmed Dar for offences under Section 38 and 39 of the UAPA…there is no bar under law to hold him guilty for both these offences,” it said.

The prosecution had claimed that Fazli had also contacted LeT operatives, and he had later led the probe team to Shah.

But the court said today that “the evidence regarding the fact that police were led to Mohd Rafiq Shah by Mohd Hussain Fazli is rather sketchy.”

“Even if Mohd Hussain Fazli had, in fact, led the team to Mohd Rafiq, it cannot be said that he was conspiring with Mohd Rafiq or any other accused with respect to the blasts… The failure of the prosecution to prove any involvement of Mohd Rafiq Shah… points to the direction that there is no evidence to hold that Mohd Hussain Fazli was involved in any manner with the conspiracy behind the blasts,” said the court.

The prosecution had claimed that the accused had entered into a criminal conspiracy to wage a war against the country and planned the serial blasts.

Two others, Farooq Ahmed Batloo and Ghulam Ahmed Khan, who were charged with funding terror, had earlier pleaded guilty. They were let off by the court as they had already undergone the jail term.

Five other accused — Abu Ozefa, Abu Al Kama, Rashid, Sazid Ali and Zahid — are still at large and are said to be in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. (The Indian Express)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

DISCLAIMER

Caravan Daily is not responsible for views and claims expressed by contributors and for reports sourced by other media networks and news agencies. They do not necessarily represent or reflect the editorial policy of the publication. www.caravandaily.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Scroll To Top